Discover how the final rule from the CDC expands access to the World Trade Center (WTC) Health Program, now including Pentagon and Shanksville responders. This course unpacks the statutory changes, capped at 500 new enrollees, detailing the impact and compliance with...
CFTC’s Proposed Operational Resilience Framework for Key Financial Entities
$129.99
This course provides a thorough insight into the CFTC’s proposed Operational Resilience Framework, designed to enhance the resilience of Futures Commission Merchants, Swap Dealers, and Major Swap Participants. Learn about the key components such as information and technology security, third-party relationship management, and business continuity plans, and understand how to effectively implement these to mitigate operational risks.
In this course you will learn the following:
* Understand the purpose, intent, and scope of the proposed ORF rule.
* Explain the three core components of the ORF: the information and technology security program, the third-party relationship program, and the business continuity and disaster recovery plan.
* Describe the governance, training, testing, and recordkeeping requirements of the proposed rule.
* Understand the notification requirements to the CFTC and customers/counterparties.
* Articulate how to provide feedback on the proposed rule during the public comment period.
* Recognize that the rule is not yet finalized and may be subject to change.
NOTE: Unless otherwise indicated, all course purchases are for access to the course for a period of 1-year. At the end of the one year term, the course will be set to “inactive”.
Additional information
| Federal Register Title | Operational Resilience Framework for Futures Commission Merchants, Swap Dealers, and Major Swap Participants. Document Number: 2023-28745 |
|---|---|
| Course SKU | FR-24-694-1 |
| Why This Course Is Important | By not enrolling, you risk being unprepared for potential operational disruptions, missing out on critical insights into governance, security, and compliance, and failing to effectively engage in the public comment process that could influence the final rule. |